AI Visibility Tracking ToolFree checker

Is 99Visibility a good fit for agencies managing several client brands?

99Visibility Research · Updated October 21, 2026 · 5 min read

Short answer

99Visibility fits agencies that manage up to five client brands in one account. The Growth plan ($99/mo) covers 3 brands with 50 keywords and 50 audits a month. Pro ($149/mo) covers 5 brands with 100 keywords and 150 audits a month. Both paid plans audit ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude, each scored on its own. Larger rosters should check the pricing page first.

Key takeaways

  • Growth covers 3 brands (50 keywords, 50 audits a month) and Pro covers 5 brands (100 keywords, 150 audits a month).
  • Paid plans audit five platforms: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude.
  • Split the keyword and audit allowance across your client roster before you pick a plan, because the limits are per account.
  • Per-platform scores matter for client reporting because engines behave very differently on the same brand.
  • No tool can promise a client citations or a rank, so sell fixes to access and wrong facts, not outcomes.

The short answer: fit depends on how many brands you run

An agency is a good fit if its AI visibility roster is five brands or fewer per account. That is the documented ceiling on the plans.

  • Growth, $99/mo: 3 brands, 50 keywords, 50 audits a month.
  • Pro, $149/mo: 5 brands, 100 keywords, 150 audits a month.
  • Paid plans audit five platforms: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude.

The product audits how those platforms describe each brand, flags wrong facts, checks whether AI crawlers can reach the site, and recommends fixes. That makes it a fixing tool as much as a tracker, which changes what you can put in a client report. If you want the difference spelled out, read tracking tools vs fixing tools.

If you manage ten or more brands, the plans listed here do not cover that in one account. Work through what an agency with 10+ client brands should look for before committing.

Do the keyword and audit limits cover your client work?

The limits apply to the account, not to each brand. Divide them by your roster to see what each client actually gets.

Plan Brands Keywords per brand (even split) Audits per brand per month (even split)
Growth 3 about 16 about 16
Pro 5 20 30

An even split is rarely how agencies work. A flagship client might need 40 keywords while a smaller retainer needs 10. The pool lets you weight it that way.

Three questions settle the choice:

  1. How many brands need AI visibility reporting this quarter? Three or fewer points to Growth. Four or five points to Pro.
  2. How often do you report? Monthly reporting with a recheck after each fix uses audits faster than a single monthly run.
  3. How many buyer questions matter per client? A narrow local business needs fewer keywords than a software company with several product lines.

Say you run a small agency with four clients and monthly reports. Growth cannot hold the fourth brand, so Pro is the only documented plan that fits.

Why per-platform reporting matters for clients

Clients ask "are we showing up in AI?" as if AI were one place. It isn't. Each engine uses its own index, its own models and its own rules for when to search the web.

The clearest public example is OtterlyAI's 2026 experiment. Otterly reported that Microsoft Copilot produced 2,718 of the 3,934 tracked citations for one test site, while ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews and AI Mode almost never cited it. A single blended score would have hidden that split. Google itself says AI Overviews and AI Mode "may use different models and techniques" and can return different links.

That is why the audit scores each platform on its own. For an agency, it means a report can say "Perplexity describes your pricing correctly, ChatGPT does not" instead of quoting one number. It also helps when the same wrong fact shows up on several platforms, because you can see whether it is one source or several.

For report structure, the agency client reporting playbook covers what to include and how to label it.

What an audit can and cannot promise a client

Be plain with clients about what sits in their control. The levers with real evidence behind them are access levers, and they work by removing blocks.

In the client's control:

  • Per-bot robots.txt rules. OpenAI's crawler page says each setting is independent. Blocking GPTBot stops training use. OAI-SearchBot controls ChatGPT search.
  • Firewall and CDN settings. A CDN can turn away an AI crawler that robots.txt allows.
  • Rendering. Vercel found ChatGPT and Claude crawlers fetch JavaScript files but do not execute them. Facts that appear only after JavaScript runs may be invisible to them. The playbook on finding facts hidden behind JavaScript shows how to check.
  • Stated facts. A specific price or one-line definition on a fetchable page gives an engine a sentence it can quote.

Not in anyone's control: what a model says, whether it searches the web for a given question, and where it places a brand. Google reports AI impressions only, with no position data, so never sell a client an "AI rank". Promise fixes to what blocks them, not citations.

Edge cases and what to do next

A few situations change the answer.

  • More than five brands. The documented plans stop at five. Check current options on the 99Visibility pricing page before you onboard a larger roster.
  • A client who cares about Google AI Mode. AI Mode is not one of the five audited platforms listed for paid plans. Treat it as a separate check.
  • A prospect pitch. The free checker on this site gives a snapshot of up to three buyer questions. It is not continuous tracking, so use it to open a conversation, not to report.
  • A client wanting one dashboard for every engine. Read whether one dashboard can track every AI engine to set expectations.

Next move: list your clients, count the buyer questions each one needs, and divide by the plan limits. For the full feature and price overview, see what 99Visibility checks and costs.

Frequently asked questions

How many platforms does each plan audit?

The paid plans (Starter, Growth and Pro) audit five platforms: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude. The Free plan audits two. For agency work, the paid plans matter because clients rarely care about one engine alone, and the engines often disagree about the same brand.

Can I split keywords unevenly between client brands?

The keyword and audit limits are stated per plan, not per brand. On Pro, that is 100 keywords and 150 audits a month across up to five brands. An agency can weight the pool toward the clients with broader product lines or more competitive categories, as long as the total stays inside the plan limit.

Is there a free way to test it before buying for clients?

Yes. The Free plan costs $0 and covers 5 keywords, 1 audit a month and 1 brand, with no card required at signup. That is enough to see the report format on one brand, including the per-platform scoring and flagged wrong facts, before you commit client budget to a paid plan.

Can I tell clients their AI ranking or position?

No, and no honest tool should. Google exposes impressions only for its AI features, with no position data to check a rank against. ChatGPT and Claude decide per question whether to search the web at all. Report presence, accuracy and access issues per platform, and label any score as a model rather than a measurement.

Does allowing GPTBot help a client appear in ChatGPT?

Not according to OpenAI. As of October 2026, its crawler documentation says GPTBot governs training use only, and OAI-SearchBot controls whether a site can appear in ChatGPT search. The settings are independent. Check each client's robots.txt per bot, then confirm their CDN or firewall does not block the crawler that robots.txt allows.

Sources

  1. AI Features and Your Website
  2. Overview of OpenAI Crawlers
  3. 2000 AI Blogs Experiment: Does Google Penalize AI Content?
  4. The rise of the AI crawler - Vercel

This page is AI-assisted. It was written from a verified evidence base and checked against our editorial policy. Engine behaviour changes often; facts are as of October 21, 2026.

Keep reading