Prompt Research: Finding the Questions Buyers Ask AI
99Visibility Research · Updated October 21, 2026 · 7 min read
Short answer
AI prompt research is the work of building a realistic list of questions your buyers would put to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude. No tool shows real prompt volumes, so the list is a judgement built from evidence you already hold: sales calls, support tickets, search queries and, where available, Bing's grounding queries. Treat it as a test set, not demand data.
Key takeaways
- No tool shows how often buyers type a given prompt into an AI app, so a prompt list is informed judgement, not a demand forecast.
- Engines rewrite prompts into their own search queries, so the exact wording you test is a proxy for an input you cannot see.
- Your best raw material is the buyer's own words: sales call notes, support tickets and the queries in Search Console.
- Bing Webmaster Tools is the only source that shows grounding queries, the searches an AI actually ran before citing a page.
- Rebuild the list each quarter and after any product, pricing or positioning change, and keep a fixed core so results stay comparable.
Why prompt research is judgement, not demand data
No tool shows real prompt volumes. OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and Perplexity do not publish how often people ask a given question. Any prompt tool that shows a volume number is estimating, usually by borrowing search keyword data.
The wording problem goes deeper. OpenAI says ChatGPT search typically rewrites a user's question into one or more targeted queries before sending them to search providers. Google describes a query fan-out technique for AI Mode, issuing several related searches across subtopics. The Gemini API generates its own search queries when grounding is on. So the prompt a buyer types is not the query that fetches pages.
What that means: you are not trying to guess an exact string. You are trying to cover the real jobs, worries and comparisons your buyers bring to an AI app. Topical fit matters more than phrasing. The 252,000-trial factorial study found topical relevance and list position were the biggest drivers of being cited first, and Google's AI optimization guide says you don't need to chase every long-tail variation.
The next move is to source prompts from places where buyers already speak in their own words. If you want the difference spelled out, see keywords vs prompts in AI search.
Four places realistic prompts come from
Each source shows a different slice of buyer intent. Use all four if you can.
| Source | What it gives you | Main limit |
|---|---|---|
| Sales call notes and recordings | Comparison and shortlist questions in the buyer's words | Biased toward people who already found you |
| Support tickets and chat logs | Problems, edge cases, "can it do X" questions | Mostly existing customers |
| Search Console queries | Real search phrasing, with impressions | Classic search only, not AI prompts |
| Bing grounding queries | The searches an AI ran before citing your pages | A sample, Microsoft surfaces only |
Sales calls
Listen for the question a prospect asked before they booked the call. "We looked at three tools and couldn't tell which one handles multi-location billing" is a prompt waiting to be written.
Support tickets
Tickets show how customers describe problems before they know your product's vocabulary. Those descriptions are close to what someone types into an AI app.
Search queries
Google Search Console's performance report shows the queries that earned impressions. Its generative AI report, as of October 2026, shows impressions by page, country, date and device, not by query. Use the classic query list as a phrasing source, not as AI demand.
Grounding queries
Bing Webmaster Tools' AI Performance report shows grounding queries: the key phrases the AI used when retrieving content it cited in Copilot, Bing AI summaries and some partner integrations. Microsoft labels this a sample. When the evidence behind this page was checked in August 2026, the report had no API, so you export it by hand.
The method, step by step
Plan on an afternoon for the first pass.
- List the buying jobs. Write the five to ten jobs a buyer hires a product like yours to do. Example, clearly hypothetical: say you sell scheduling software to dental clinics. Jobs might include "reduce no-shows", "book across three locations" and "replace a paper diary".
- Pull raw phrases. Take the last few months of sales notes, support tickets and Search Console queries. Copy the buyer's sentences verbatim. Do not clean them up yet.
- Export grounding queries. If your site is verified in Bing Webmaster Tools, export the grounding queries. Tag each one with the job it matches.
- Write prompts as a buyer would ask an AI. Turn phrases into full questions. Keep the buyer's words and constraints: budget, location, team size, integration. "What scheduling software works for a dental group with three clinics and reduces no-shows?" beats "best dental scheduling software".
- Cover the buying stages. For each job, write at least one problem question, one shortlist question ("which tools do X") and one comparison question ("X vs Y for Z").
- Remove your brand name from most prompts. A prompt that names you tests recall of your facts, which is useful but different. Keep a small, separate set of branded prompts for accuracy checks.
- Test under fixed conditions. Run prompts logged out, or with memory off. OpenAI says ChatGPT may use saved memories when rewriting a search query, which makes logged-in results hard to repeat.
- Record who gets named and what is said. Note which brands appear, which sources are cited, and any wrong facts about you.
- Freeze a core set. Pick the prompts that best represent your buyers and keep them unchanged between runs so trends mean something.
If you want a no-cost way to run steps one to five, the free prompt research walkthrough covers it. For whether to write prompts yourself or let software draft them, see own prompts vs tool-generated.
Prompt set checklist
Run your draft list against this before you test anything.
- Every prompt traces back to a real source: a call, a ticket, a search query or a grounding query.
- Every buying job has problem, shortlist and comparison prompts.
- Most prompts do not contain your brand name.
- Prompts include the constraints real buyers mention (size, budget, region, integrations).
- Competitor names appear in comparison prompts the way buyers actually phrase them.
- No prompt is a keyword fragment pasted from a keyword tool.
- No prompt is written to flatter your product's strongest feature.
- Branded accuracy prompts cover the facts AI most often gets wrong: pricing, plans, location, what the product does.
- A frozen core set is marked, with the date it was frozen.
- Test conditions are written down: logged out or memory off, which engines, which date.
If a prompt fails two or more items, rewrite it or drop it. Keyword tools are fine for ideas, but treat them as ideas, not demand data.
What good and bad results look like
A good prompt set gives you answers you did not expect. That is the point of testing.
Signs the research is working
- Answers name competitors you know, and some you did not.
- Different engines give different shortlists for the same prompt. That is normal, because each engine draws on its own index and retrieval.
- You can see which third-party pages engines cite for your category. Being named on those pages is associated with being named in answers, though no one has measured a promised effect.
- Branded prompts surface specific wrong facts you can fix on your own site.
Signs it is not
- Every answer names you. Your prompts are probably too narrow or too branded.
- No answer names anyone useful. Your prompts may be too vague to trigger a shortlist.
- Results change completely every run. Check that you fixed the test conditions.
- The list reads like your keyword spreadsheet. Go back to the buyer's own words.
When you find prompts where rivals are named and you are not, the competitor prompt gap analysis is the next step. Be plain about one limit: a test answer is a sample, not what every buyer sees. Retrieval fires at the engine's discretion, so the same prompt can be answered with or without live search.
How often to repeat it
Rebuild the full list once a quarter. Fresh calls and tickets bring new problems and new competitor names.
Rerun the frozen core set monthly, or after any of these:
- You change pricing, plans or product names.
- You launch into a new segment or region.
- A major engine changes its default model. Consumer apps change models often, and the model behind "ChatGPT" depends on plan.
- Your site changes how it renders or who it lets in. If a firewall or robots.txt change blocks an AI crawler, answers can shift for reasons that have nothing to do with prompts.
Keep the old list. Comparing this quarter's prompts with last quarter's shows how buyer language is moving. For a quick snapshot between full runs, the free checker on this site shows whether AI names you for up to three buyer questions. It is a point-in-time check, not tracking.
Frequently asked questions
How many prompts do I need?
There is no evidence-based number. Size the list by coverage, not count. Each buying job should have problem, shortlist and comparison prompts, plus a small branded set for accuracy. A focused list you test consistently is more useful than hundreds of loosely related prompts. Start small, freeze a core set, and add prompts only when a new source of buyer language justifies them.
Can any tool tell me how many people ask a prompt?
No. AI platforms do not publish prompt volumes. Tools that show a volume are usually reusing search keyword data or modelling an estimate. The closest first-party signal is Bing Webmaster Tools' grounding queries, which show searches an AI ran before citing your pages, as a sample. Google's generative AI report in Search Console shows impressions, not queries.
Does exact wording matter if engines rewrite prompts?
Less than people assume. OpenAI says ChatGPT rewrites questions into targeted queries, and Google fans queries out across subtopics. What matters more is covering the right topic and constraints. Wording still affects which shortlist an answer produces, so keep the buyer's phrasing. For more, see [how phrasing affects brand mentions](/questions/question-phrasing-ai-brand-mentions).
Should I use AI to generate my prompt list?
Use it to expand and clean up phrases you sourced from calls, tickets and queries, not to invent the list from nothing. A model asked to write buyer prompts tends to produce generic, well-formed questions that real buyers rarely type. Check every generated prompt against a real source before it enters your test set.
Is this different for B2B software?
The method is the same, but sales calls carry more weight because buying cycles are longer and comparison questions are detailed. Expect prompts about integrations, security, pricing tiers and team size. The [B2B software guide](/industries/ai-visibility-b2b-software) covers what to watch for in that category.
Sources
This page is AI-assisted. It was written from a verified evidence base and checked against our editorial policy. Engine behaviour changes often; facts are as of October 21, 2026.