Copilot Sources: How Microsoft Copilot Grounds Answers in Bing
99Visibility Research · Updated October 21, 2026 · 7 min read
Short answer
Microsoft Copilot and Bing's AI summaries draw their sources from the Bing index. If Bing has not indexed a page, Copilot has no documented way to cite it. In Otterly's 2026 test, Copilot kept citing two sites that Bing kept after Google deindexed them. Microsoft publishes its webmaster guidelines and suppression controls, but it does not publish how Copilot chooses which indexed pages to cite.
Key takeaways
- Copilot, Bing AI summaries and Azure's Grounding with Bing Search are all backed by the Bing index, so Bing index presence is the first gate.
- In Otterly's test, Microsoft Copilot produced 2,718 of the 3,934 tracked citations for a site that Google had deindexed but Bing kept.
- Microsoft does not publish the criteria Copilot uses to pick sources from the index, so nobody outside Microsoft can promise a Copilot citation.
- Your real controls are access and suppression: bingbot permission, firewall reachability, noindex, nosnippet and data-nosnippet.
- Bing Webmaster Tools' AI Performance report is the only first-party view of Copilot citations and the grounding queries behind them.
Where Copilot gets its sources
Copilot answers from the Bing index. Microsoft documents Web Search and Grounding with Bing Search as generally available options on its agents API, and both are backed by Bing's index (Microsoft Learn, April 2026). The same index feeds Microsoft Copilot and the AI-generated summaries inside Bing.
That makes the chain simple to state:
- bingbot crawls your page.
- Bing decides whether to index it.
- At answer time, Copilot runs one or more grounding queries against that index.
- The model picks which retrieved pages to use and cite.
You influence the first two steps. Microsoft controls the last two. If you want the full picture of how this differs from Google, see which AI answers use which index.
One detail matters for measurement. Vercel's crawler study excluded Microsoft Copilot because it has no unique user agent. In practice, access for Copilot runs through bingbot, the same crawler that serves classic Bing search.
What Microsoft documents, and what it does not
Microsoft documents more than most AI vendors about where sources come from. It documents much less about how they are chosen.
Documented
- The index. Copilot and Bing AI summaries ground on Bing, and Grounding with Bing Search is a GA developer product.
- The guidelines. Bing's Webmaster Guidelines describe what Bing indexes and what it treats as spam.
- The suppression controls. Bing added support for
data-nosnippetin October 2025. Content with that attribute "is still indexed normally, but it will be excluded from snippets and AI summaries." - The reporting. Bing Webmaster Tools' AI Performance report shows citations and grounding queries (more below).
Not documented
- Any ranking or selection criteria for which indexed pages Copilot cites.
- Any effect size for being in Bing on being cited by Copilot.
- How grounding queries are generated from a user's prompt.
Microsoft's own framing (May 2026) is that "search indexing was built to help humans decide what to read. Grounding indexing is being built to help AI systems decide what to say." It describes a purpose, not a formula. Treat anyone who claims to know Copilot's citation rules as guessing.
The link to ChatGPT is weaker still. OpenAI says ChatGPT search "sometimes partners with other search providers" and names Microsoft, but nobody has measured how much Bing presence moves ChatGPT results.
What Otterly's test showed about Bing and Copilot
OtterlyAI published a 2026 experiment that isolates the index effect better than anything else in the public record. It launched two new domains with roughly 1,000 AI-generated posts each, then tracked Google, Bing and seven AI engines for about four months.
The results, from Otterly's write-up:
| What happened | Google side | Bing side |
|---|---|---|
| Index status | Both sites deindexed, after about 14 and about 90 days | Bing never deindexed either site |
| Impressions | Fell to near zero | Combined Bing impressions grew every month, to 119,935 in July |
| AI citations | Google AI Overviews, AI Mode and Gemini almost never cited them | Microsoft Copilot produced 2,718 of capybara-world.com's 3,934 tracked citations (69%) |
Microsoft's own AI Performance report credited capybara-world.com with 42,817 citations, more than ten times Otterly's prompt-based count. The time windows may not match, but it shows that a prompt tracker sees a sample.
Two lessons follow. An engine cannot cite what its index no longer holds, and Copilot kept citing what Bing kept. Being indexed is also not enough on its own: ChatGPT cited the sites effectively zero times, even while they ranked in Bing.
Keep the limits in view. It was one site per arm, on a low-competition topic (capybaras), run by a vendor that sells AI tracking. It shows the index mechanism working. It does not show that thin pages beat established sources in a commercial category, and mass-publishing cost both sites Google entirely. For the narrower question of pages missing from Bing, see whether Copilot can cite a site that isn't in Bing's index.
The controls you actually hold
Everything you control sits at the access stage. These levers remove blocks. None of them makes a page more likely to be chosen.
Let bingbot in
Your robots.txt must not disallow bingbot. A blanket AI block written for training crawlers can catch it by accident. A minimal check looks like this:
User-agent: bingbot
Allow: /
Make sure the network agrees with robots.txt
A firewall or CDN can return a 403 to a crawler that robots.txt allows. The operators document this mechanism, though nobody has measured how often it happens. The AI Crawler Checker requests a page as each crawler and shows which ones your firewall turns away.
Check for accidental suppression
noindexremoves the page from Bing's index, and so from Copilot.nosnippetandmax-snippet:0limit what can be shown.data-nosnippetkeeps a block out of Bing's snippets and AI summaries while it stays "available for ranking."
These often arrive inherited from a template. Search your HTML for them.
IndexNow, scoped honestly
Bing consumes IndexNow, and Microsoft has asserted, without a published study, that it helps AI systems reference the current version of a page. The IndexNow specification never mentions AI, and a 200 response confirms only that the ping was received. Treat it as free Bing hygiene with no citation promise.
The broader playbook is in getting into Microsoft's AI answers.
Seeing what Copilot cites
Bing Webmaster Tools' AI Performance report has been in public preview since February 2026 and was expanded in June 2026. It covers Microsoft Copilot, AI-generated summaries in Bing and select partner integrations. It shows Total Citations, Average Cited Pages, page-level citation activity, Citation Share, intents, topics and grounding queries.
Grounding queries are the unusual part. They are the phrases the AI actually ran against the index when it retrieved content it then cited. No other vendor exposes the real retrieval queries. Every prompt-based tracker tests prompts it chose, which are a proxy for queries nobody else can see. Our playbook on exporting and analyzing Bing grounding queries walks through using them.
Carry three caveats:
- Microsoft says the grounding query data is a sample of citation activity. The note sits in that subsection, so do not assume the whole report is sampled. More in is Bing's AI Performance data complete or sampled.
- Microsoft calls Citation Share "an observational metric, not a ranking system or a competitive scoreboard."
- As of the evidence date (August 2026), the report had no API. Microsoft has indicated API access during 2026, so check before you build a workflow around exports.
What to do next
Work through the gates in order, because each one depends on the last.
- Verify the site in Bing Webmaster Tools. Confirm your key pages are indexed. Google Search Console tells you nothing about Bing.
- Test access. Check that robots.txt allows bingbot and that your CDN returns a 200, not a 403 or a challenge page.
- Remove accidental suppression. Audit
noindex,nosnippet,max-snippetanddata-nosnippeton pages that carry your pricing and product facts. - State your facts plainly in the HTML. A specific price or one-line definition on a fetchable page gives Copilot a sentence it can quote. If Copilot already states something wrong about you, see fixing wrong facts in Copilot answers.
- Read the AI Performance report monthly. Compare grounding queries with the questions you assumed buyers ask.
What stays out of your hands, as of October 2026: which indexed pages Copilot selects, how it rewrites prompts into grounding queries, and whether any given answer cites you. Fix the gates, then measure.
Frequently asked questions
Does Copilot use Google's index at all?
Nothing Microsoft documents says so. Copilot, Bing AI summaries and Grounding with Bing Search are documented as Bing-index-backed. Otterly's test fits that: after Google deindexed two sites, Copilot kept citing them because Bing still held them, while Google's own AI surfaces almost stopped. Check your Bing index status separately from Google, because one being healthy tells you nothing about the other.
Is there a separate Copilot crawler I should allow?
The evidence names no separate Copilot crawler. Vercel's crawler study excluded Microsoft Copilot because it has no unique user agent. Access for Copilot's grounding runs through bingbot, which also serves classic Bing search. Allow bingbot in robots.txt and confirm your firewall or CDN does not block it, since a 403 at the network layer overrides an Allow line.
Will getting into Bing get me cited in ChatGPT?
Not reliably. OpenAI says ChatGPT search sometimes partners with other search providers and names Microsoft, but nobody has measured that path. In Otterly's test, sites ranking in Bing got effectively zero ChatGPT citations even while ChatGPT's crawlers visited them. ChatGPT search eligibility depends on OAI-SearchBot access, which is a separate setting from bingbot.
Does data-nosnippet hurt my Bing rankings?
Bing says no. Content marked with data-nosnippet is still indexed normally and remains available for ranking, but it is excluded from snippets and AI summaries. That makes it useful for hiding a block you do not want quoted, and risky when a template applies it by accident to pricing or product text. Search your HTML for the attribute and confirm every use was intended.
Can I see which questions led Copilot to cite me?
Partly. Bing Webmaster Tools' AI Performance report shows grounding queries, the phrases the AI ran when it retrieved content it then cited. Those are not the user's original prompts, and Microsoft describes the grounding query data as a sample. As of August 2026 the report had no API, so you read it in the interface or export it manually.
Sources
This page is AI-assisted. It was written from a verified evidence base and checked against our editorial policy. Engine behaviour changes often; facts are as of October 21, 2026.